

Nicholas Stefanelli’s Puglian-inspired prix fixe menus served in an Italian country–chic setting.
Address and Contact Information
Address: 1340 4th St NE, Washington, DC 20002
Phone: (202) 608-1330
Website: http://www.masseria-dc.com/
Menu Photos
Order and Reservations
Reservations: exploretock.com
Photo Gallery
Related Web Results
Menu — Masseria by Nicholas Stefanelli | Washington DC
Masseria by Nicholas Stefanelli | Washington DC
Masseria – Washington – a MICHELIN Guide Restaurant
Reviews
Food was good, creative, certainly a visual treat, loved the desserts. The chefs really do put in a lot of attention to detail. We saw every dish that went out.
Service was a bit lacking, I guess they aren’t too worried about being warm since the 20% gratuity is already added in the bill.
The dishes were explained well, but apart from the lady who served us dessert, there wasn’t any fluidity to the explanations, it all felt like instructions.
The bathroom looked subpar for a Michelin rated restaurant. The music could have been more ambient.
The prices weren’t too bad. We don’t mind paying that much if the whole experience was worth that much. I have been to a few Michelin star restaurants, I didn’t feel it live up to the Michelin experience.
We arrived for our 8:30pm reservation, having already selected the 6-course tasting menu. All the staff needed from us was a drink order and any supplements. Yet:
• 15 minutes passed before we even met our server—and only after we flagged down a different staff member to ask who our server was.
• 40 minutes before cutlery arrived.
• 41 minutes until bread and butter.
• No amuse-bouche, which is standard at this level.
Our server’s brief initial greeting (“welcome or welcome back”) was followed by a 15-minute disappearance as he attended to other tables. It felt less like fine dining and more like being forgotten at a busy café.
To give credit where due, 5 of 8 courses tasted on par with a 1-star Michelin restaurant:
• Kampachi crudo (4.5/5) — Bright, balanced, genuinely excellent.
• Chestnut ravioli (4.5/5) — Deeply savory with a beautiful brown-butter sauce.
• Foie gras supplement (4/5) — Lovely flavor, though our server did not adequately explain the mechanics of supplements versus substitutions and had difficulty remembering when we wanted the dish served.
• Pre-dessert (4.5/5) and main dessert (4/5) — Refined, delicious.
But several dishes fell flat:
• John Dory (2.5/5) — Overcooked, oversalted, and texturally disappointing.
• Linguini with XO sauce (2/5) — More “Chinese fusion” than Italian, intensely salty, and lacked any actual seafood.
• Veal trio (3/5) — Loin was cooked medium-rare yet still inexplicably dry and chewy; sweetbread and sausage were flavorful but aggressively salted.
The flavors also began to repeat themselves—several courses shared the same celeriac/meat-jus profile, making the progression feel redundant.
Masseria features an open kitchen, which typically showcases the precision and choreography of a well-run Michelin team. Instead, we repeatedly saw half the chefs standing idle while dishes trickled out at a glacial pace.
After we politely voiced our concern about the slow start, the staff attempted to make amends by bringing complimentary wine pours and a mini-cocktail. A nice gesture in theory—but these drinks arrived after we had already ordered our own cocktails (three each). The result was borderline over-serving, leaving us consuming far more alcohol than we actually intended.
The bathroom was not well maintained, with fecal splatter visible on both the inner and outer sides of the toilet seat. This is unacceptable in any fine-dining environment.
While several dishes were genuinely excellent and showed clear culinary talent, the service, pacing, inconsistent execution, and poorly maintained facilities made the evening feel far below Michelin standards. The pricing aligns more closely with a 2- or 3-star restaurant, yet the experience was nowhere near that level.
I left feeling disappointed because Masseria could deliver an exceptional night—the ingredients and kitchen skill are there—but the operational flaws overshadowed what should have been a special meal.
The food was generally good. They do serve you a lot with the eight courses. Pasta and risotto dishes were excellent. A sweet burrata dish early on threw off my palate. (My husband, with his sweet tooth, enjoyed it—so it’s clearly subjective.) The poultry was tough in spots, and the fennel with the crab was hard to cut. The cocktails were excellent. The wine pairings were also great and worked well with the dishes, except I didn’t love the dessert pairing which was anise flavored. (Risky pick given how many people don’t love anise.) But the real disappointment was the service and ambiance.
We did the chef’s tasting at the kitchen counter and paid over $1K for two people. Unlike other Michelin chef’s tables I’ve experienced, the chef never acknowledged us, and only one member of the kitchen team briefly interacted. I wasn’t expecting extensive interaction since it was a Saturday and they could have been busier than usual, but the experience felt cold and impersonal. I don’t think a chef should offer a chef’s table if they don’t plan to interact with guests.
Service was very good. They were very attentive to food allergies and ensured substitute dishes were provided.
The atmosphere was nice. We sat inside but the outside seating area looked great.
So, so, so overpriced.
How do you have a $700 dinner for two (with no wine) and still leave hungry?
Sure, we had a couple drinks each, but come on. This place is at the armpit of Union Market. No view. Okay decor.
Nice curated playlist, but too loud. Never need to go back.
Service was impeccable, food was phenomenal, and the whole vibe at the chief’s counter was perfect.
My favorite dishes for this October menu
– A5 Wagyu enhancement.
– The gnocchi.
– The Burrata.
Everything else was delicious, but those stole the show for me!