

Outpost of upmarket steakhouse chain known for sizzling, butter-topped beef in an elegant setting
Hours
| Friday | 12–11 PM |
| Saturday | 12–11 PM |
| Sunday | 12–10 PM |
| Monday | 12–10 PM |
| Tuesday | 12–10 PM |
| Wednesday | 12–10 PM |
| Thursday | 12–10 PM |
Address and Contact Information
Address: Columbia Center, 924-A-Senate Street Hilton, 924 Senate St, Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: (803) 212-6666
Website: https://ruthschris.net/columbia/
Menu Photos
Order and Reservations
Reservations: ruthschris.net
Photo Gallery
Related Web Results
Ruth’s Chris Steak House in Columbia, South Carolina
Home | Ruth’s Chris Steak House
Ruth’s Chris Steak House – Columbia
Last Updates
Reviews
The food missed the mark. The lobster mac tasted like sliced cheese, and the crab cakes had almost no flavor. The one bright spot was my server, Ally. She was kind, quick, and took great care of me. She deserves a full five out of five.
Unfortunately the overall experience was not worth the visit, and I will not be staying here again or returning to the restaurant.
Reservation
The waiting area assigned for guests was small and extremely noisy, largely due to the hostess staff gathering and having unrelated conversations. Making a reservation felt pointless, as we were not seated until nearly an hour after our scheduled time.
Dining Experience
Once seated, we were told the bread had just gone into the oven and that we would receive some once it was ready. However, we watched multiple surrounding tables receive bread while we did not. Our waiter, Chris, went missing, and we eventually had to ask another waiter for bread. When it finally arrived, it was underbaked—pale and doughy in the center—and clearly needed another 3–5 minutes in the oven.
We then experienced a lengthy wait for our entrées. When the food arrived, the presentation was extremely off-putting. One server explained that butter had splattered onto the rim of my plate and stated that it “wasn’t her fault.” Unfortunately, my $72 T-bone looked as though it had been served on a dirty plate. Simply wiping the rim before serving would have taken seconds and made a significant difference.
Additionally, my husband’s waiter promised to refill his drink but again went missing.
When the manager came to our table, he offered a very dry apology and essentially excused the poor plating as normal. Ruth’s Chris markets itself as an upscale dining experience. When guests pay premium prices, they expect premium service. Instead, we received less—less courtesy, less attentiveness, less quality, and no attempt at meaningful compensation.
We are typically very generous tippers, especially during the holidays, often tipping 40%. However, the only tip I could leave after this experience is this: better business practices are what keep customers coming back.
Unfortunately, we will not be returning.
Before ordering, we clearly informed our server that there was a nut allergy at the table. This was acknowledged. We relied on the restaurant—particularly one of this reputation—to properly guide us and disclose any dishes that contained nuts.
Despite this, my partner was served the sweet potato casserole without any disclosure that it contained pecans, a common and well-known allergen that is not visually obvious in the dish. After consuming the food, she suffered an allergic reaction severe enough to require immediate medical attention and an ER visit.
What followed made the situation even more concerning:
• The presence of pecans was never disclosed, despite a nut allergy being communicated
• After the allergic reaction was known, staff boxed the allergen-containing dish together with the rest of our food, causing cross-contamination
• Because of this, the entire meal had to be thrown away
• A second serving of the same dish—which we did not order—was brought to the table and encouraged to be eaten
• The situation was escalated to management, where accountability was notably lacking
When we later spoke with the General Manager, Justin Caldwell, the handling of the situation was deeply disappointing. Rather than acknowledging the failure to disclose a known allergen that resulted in a medical emergency, responsibility was repeatedly shifted onto us.
Mr. Caldwell offered a gift certificate worth roughly half the value of the meal and stated that the purpose of this certificate would be for us to “come back and correctly identify the allergen.” This implication was troubling, as we did disclose a nut allergy the first time, and the incident occurred because the restaurant failed to disclose that the dish contained pecans.
To further address the matter, we escalated the issue to corporate and spoke with Megan Cromwell, Director of Guest Relations. Unfortunately, she reiterated the same position as the general manager—maintaining that the restaurant was not responsible and again placing the burden on the guest rather than acknowledging the failure to disclose a known allergen that led to emergency medical care.
At no point was a full refund offered. Instead, both location management and corporate guest relations focused on technical distinctions and deflection, rather than the fact that a guest was sent to the ER due to an undisclosed allergen.
At a restaurant of this caliber, guests should not be expected to interrogate every dish for hidden ingredients after clearly stating a nut allergy. The ethical responsibility of a restaurant is to disclose known allergens, handle food safely, and take accountability when failures occur—not to minimize harm or suggest the guest failed to communicate correctly after a medical emergency.
This was not a minor inconvenience. It was a serious food safety failure, followed by dismissive and unfair handling at both the restaurant and corporate levels. Until meaningful changes are made to allergen disclosure practices, staff training, and accountability, I cannot recommend this location—especially to anyone with food allergies.
I ordered the lamb chops cooked medium, but only one of them was prepared to the correct temperature. When I brought this to the waitress’s attention, she offered to take the lamb chops I had already cut into and place them back on the grill to cook longer. That approach felt somewhat unhygienic and not in line with the level of service I expected.
When the lamb chops were returned, the outside was more cooked, but the internal temperature had not improved. A manager (or another waiter) came out to apologize and offered an alternative entrée, which I accepted and appreciated. However, both he and the waitress then asked if I would like to take the original lamb chops home. I found that suggestion inappropriate and somewhat offensive. If the food was not properly prepared for me to enjoy in the restaurant, I’m not sure why I would want to take it home.
After that interaction, the level of service noticeably declined. I have never sent food back at a restaurant before, so this was uncomfortable for me. At this price point, I expect the food to be prepared correctly the first.
I expected much more from Ruth’s Chris. Never again.
We selected a wonderful bottle of Shiraz to start. We all decided to select the prefix menu and upgraded with a fillet & lobster tail which came with a choice of a salad or a gumbo. It also came with a choice of one side, which we also selected mashed potatoes, cream spinach.
We upgraded our steaks with topper adding a blue cheese crust on the filet and béarnaise.
Dessert choices: A mini dessert.
The table chose cheesecake and bread pudding (the bread pudding wasn’t even warm and it was gummy and cool).
The birthday girl selected the famous crème brûlée from Ruth Chris own house recipe.
The service was excellent.
Our server was Nathan. He was prompt and the request for the wine to be chilled slightly was brought table side. We started with our salads and everyone enjoyed the salads
(see pictures).
Our entrées arrived, the filets were room temperature though the plates were super hot. The lobster tail was overcooked and rubbery hard.
I was disappointed the prefixed menu was not a good choice.
Bread service:
The bread was undercooked not hot.
We had to ask to have a second basket brought and just as we were going to enjoy that basket of bread It was picked up and removed by another server assistant as she was removing our finished salad course.
I let Nathan know that the lobster tails were not up to par rubbery and cold way over seasoned and over salted. Nathan apologized and offered to replace them.
The “fresh lobster tails “arrived to the table once again over salted not as rubbery. I wasn’t going to ask to to have them replaced again.
I was trying to be fairly patient and yet wanted to be treated with a great dining experience with great food on this special occasion and did not received the Ruth Chris standard of service.
It seemed like the food had been pre-cooked and just being plated off the line.
The birthday guest couldn’t even eat her lobster tail, It was so bad. I waited till we got home which was an hour drive from Ruth Chris.
I called to talk to the manager this early evening. The manager and I discuss the experience. Ironically, he was one of the three managers that said hello at our table and said if you need anything to make your dining experience better do not hesitate.
Over the phone He did apologize after I told him the issues with the food.
I would have thought that he would have taken the time to offer to “make it right”, He unfortunately did not offer.
I spent well over $500 for the luncheon. He assured me he would talk to the back of the house and Let them know about the over seasoning, room temp steaks and sides. He assured me it would not happen again.
I know we will not dine again at Ruth Chris in Columbia, SC.
We will go to Halls Chophouse on our next visit to Columbia SC.
To say I was very disappointed is an understatement. We’ve actually had a better steak and lobster from a local steakhouse chain (Longhorns) in Aiken, SC.
Regards,
A Texas Foodie Steak Lover